For decades, report cards/ Achievement Records in Indian schools meant one thing — marks.

But the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP 2020) has changed that.

It introduced the concept of the Holistic Progress Card (HPC) — a 360-degree, learner-centric report card designed to reflect not just academic marks, but the overall development of a child.

If you are a school leader, principal, or academic coordinator, this guide will help you understand:

• What is Holistic Progress Card?
• Why it was introduced?
• What should it include?
• How it differs across Foundational, Preparatory, Middle, and Secondary stages?
• How schools can implement it practically?
• How to digitize and customize HPC easily?

Why Traditional Report Cards Needed Change

Earlier report cards were:

• Marks-focused

• Exam-heavy

• Comparison-based

• Stress-driven

NEP 2020 clearly states in Para 4.35 that assessment must shift towards a multidimensional 360-degree progress card.

The goal?

• Move away from rote memorization
• Reduce exam pressure
• Promote self-awareness
• Focus on competencies, not just marks

This vision is also supported by CBSE and PARAKH (Performance Assessment, Review, and Analysis of Knowledge for Holistic Development).

What is Holistic Progress Card (HPC)?

The Holistic Progress Card is:

• Learner-centric

• Competency-based

• Inclusive

• Multidimensional

• 360-degree feedback system

It includes:

• Teacher assessment

• Self-assessment

• Peer assessment

• Skills & competency tracking

• Social-emotional development

• Physical and well-being indicators

It reflects growth over time, not a single exam score.

Structure of Holistic Progress Card as per NEP 2020

NEP introduced the 5+3+3+4 academic structure:

Foundational Pre-school + Grade 1–2 3–8 Play-based, activity-based Preparatory Grade 3–5 8–11 Experiential learning Middle Grade 6–8 11–14 Subject-oriented Secondary Grade 9–12 14–18 Critical thinking, flexibility

Let’s understand how HPC differs across each stage.

Holistic Progress Card – Foundational Stage (Pre-Nursery to Grade 2)

Focus: Play, curiosity, habits.

What should be included?

• Language development

• Numeracy readiness

• Motor skills

• Social behavior

• Emotional expression

• Participation in activities

Assessment Style:

• Observation-based
• Descriptive feedback
• Developmental indicators
• No ranking 

This stage must feel encouraging, not evaluative.

Holistic Progress Card – Preparatory Stage (Grade 3–5)

Focus: Experiential learning.

HPC Should Track:

• Concept clarity

• Reading & comprehension

• Application of knowledge

• Creativity

• Teamwork

• Communication skills

• Environmental awareness

Here, numeric grading may begin but must be supported by qualitative feedback.

Holistic Progress Card – Middle Stage (Grade 6–8)

Focus: Subject understanding + competencies.

HPC Must Include:

• Subject-wise conceptual understanding

• Analytical ability

• Problem-solving

• Digital literacy

• Research skills

• Social & emotional growth

• Participation in projects

Peer assessment becomes meaningful here.

Holistic Progress Card – Secondary Stage (Grade 9–12)

Focus: Depth, critical thinking, life readiness.

HPC Should Cover:

• Core subject mastery

• Application-based learning

• Career orientation indicators

• Life skills

• Leadership qualities

• Community engagement

• Responsibility & ethics

Board exams continue, but HPC adds a broader perspective.

Key Features of a Proper Holistic Progress Card

A strong HPC must be:

✔ Participatory
✔ Inclusive
✔ Flexible
✔ Interdisciplinary
✔ Growth-oriented
✔ Competency-tracking

It should build self-esteem, not fear.

Components of a 360° Holistic Progress Card

A well-designed HPC includes:

1. Academic Performance

Concept clarity, understanding, application.

2. Skills & Competencies

• Cognitive

• Metacognitive

• Social-emotional

• Practical

3. Attitudes & Values

• Respect

• Responsibility

• Environmental awareness

4. Well-being

• Physical health

• Participation in sports

• Emotional stability

5. Self & Peer Reflection

Students reflect on:

• What they did well

• What they can improve

• Goals for next term

Common Challenges Schools Face in Implementing HPC

1. Too much manual work

2. Teachers confused about rubrics

3. No standard format

4. Lack of digital tools

5. Difficulty in maintaining consistency

This is where ERP-based automation helps.

How Schools Can Implement Holistic Progress Card Easily

Instead of managing spreadsheets, schools can:

• Define stage-wise templates

• Create skill-based rubrics

• Enable teacher, peer, self inputs

• Auto-generate descriptive feedback

• Maintain term-wise tracking

• Share digital report cards

A proper ERP system can integrate HPC within academic modules.

Read also: 
Complete NEP-aligned ERP Guide: HPC with School ERP 

Digital Holistic Progress Card – Why It Matters

Manual HPC:

• Time-consuming

• Inconsistent

• Hard to archive

Digital HPC:

✔ Standardized
✔ Editable
✔ Customizable per school
✔ Easy parent access
✔ Long-term tracking
✔ NEP-compliant

Sample Format of Holistic Progress Card

A well-designed HPC includes:

1. Student Profile

2. Academic Overview

3. Competency Matrix

4. Co-curricular Record

5. Teacher Feedback

6. Peer Reflection

7. Self-Reflection

8. Parent Remarks

9. Overall Growth Summary

Role of PARAKH in Assessment Reform

PARAKH is the national assessment centre set up to:

• Standardize assessment norms

• Guide school boards

• Promote competency-based evaluation

• Reduce rote-driven assessment

Schools aligning with HPC are future-ready.

Final Thoughts

Holistic Progress Card is not just a new report format.

It is a shift:

From marks → to growth
From comparison → to reflection
From pressure → to development

Schools that adopt HPC properly will not just comply with NEP 2020 — they will transform their learning culture. 
Do you want a software that aligns with NEP 2020 and HPC . Contact MyLeading Campus® today . Contact us

How to Choose the Best University ERP Software in India (2026 Guide) The practical guide for principals, IT heads, registrars, and decision makers

Let’s be honest.

Most universities in India don’t struggle because they lack good faculty or infrastructure.

They struggle because their systems are messy.

Admissions are in one place. Exams are handled separately. Fees are tracked in Excel. NAAC data sits in folders. Departments don’t talk to each other. And when someone asks for a report, everyone panics.

That’s why in 2026, University ERP is no longer a “nice to have”.

It’s becoming basic survival.

But choosing an ERP is not easy. Every vendor claims they are the best. Every demo looks impressive. And after purchase, many institutions realise the software doesn’t actually fit how universities work.

So in this blog, I’ll explain — in simple words — how to choose the right university ERP in India, especially for autonomous and deemed universities.

First, What Is a University ERP?

A University ERP is basically one software system that connects everything:

• Admissions

• Student records

• Attendance

• Exams

• Fees

• HR and payroll

• Library

• Placements

• NAAC and NBA reports

• Multi-campus management

Instead of running 10 different tools, you run one connected system.

If you want a detailed overview, this page explains it well: Detailed Overview

Why ERP Matters More in 2026 Than Ever Before

Universities today are dealing with more pressure than before:

• NAAC is stricter

• NBA wants proper outcome-based education data

• Students expect everything on mobile

• Parents want instant updates

• Online fee payment is expected

• Institutions are expanding into multiple campuses

And the truth is:

Excel sheets cannot run a university anymore.

A proper ERP is what keeps things aligned when scale increases.

Step 1: Don’t Start With Vendors. Start With Your Problems.

Most universities make the same mistake.

They start by calling vendors.

Instead, start by asking internally:

• What is wasting our time every day?

• Where are mistakes happening?

• Which department works in complete isolation?

• What reports do we struggle to generate?

For example:

• Admissions data doesn’t match finance data

• Examination department spends weeks preparing results

• NAAC documentation becomes a last-minute headache

• Faculty attendance is tracked manually

• Students keep calling for basic information

Write these down first.

Your ERP should solve real pain, not just look modern.

Step 2: Make Sure It’s Built for Universities, Not Schools

Many software products in India are school ERPs repackaged as “university solutions”.

Universities are different.

You need:

• Semester-based structures

• CBCS and NEP frameworks

• Multiple programs and departments

• Complex examination workflows

• Autonomous curriculum control

• NBA-style attainment reporting

A proper university ERP understands this complexity.

This guide also explains university ERP expectations clearly: University ERP & Features

Step 3: Check the Core Modules (Don’t Get Distracted)

Forget fancy buzzwords.

Ask one simple question:

Does it cover the daily work of a university properly?

At minimum, your ERP must handle:

Admissions

From enquiry to enrolment to document verification.

Student Information

A full record from first year to graduation.

Fees and Accounts

Online payments, instalments, receipts, reconciliation.

Exams and Results

Internal + end-semester exams, grade sheets, transcripts.

HR and Payroll

Faculty records, leaves, salary, compliance.

NAAC/NBA Reporting

Structured data for accreditation.

If these basics are weak, nothing else matters.

For feature clarity, you can refer here: List of Features

Step 4: Accreditation Support Is Not Optional Now

In 2026, NAAC and NBA are not just documentation exercises.

They want proof.

They want data trails.

They want consistency.

If your ERP cannot generate structured reports for:

• Criterion-wise NAAC data

• Student progression

• Faculty research

• Outcome attainment

• IQAC documentation

Then accreditation will remain stressful.

A good ERP reduces this pressure massively.

Step 5: The Software Must Be Easy for Real People

One big truth:

If faculty hate the system, it will fail.

Your ERP must work for:

• Clerks

• Faculty

• HODs

• Students

• Parents

• Finance teams

• Registrars

Ask during demo:

• Can a teacher upload marks in 2 minutes?

• Can a student see fees without calling admin?

• Can the registrar generate reports instantly?

Simple usability matters more than big dashboards.

Step 6: Ask About Implementation, Not Just Features

ERP purchase is only 30%.

Implementation is 70%.

Ask clearly:

• Who will train our staff?

• Will onboarding be on-site?

• How long does rollout take?

• What happens after go-live?

• Do you provide a support hotline?

Many universities buy software and then struggle because no one supports them properly.

Step 7: Pricing Should Be Transparent

ERP cost is not only license cost.

You must ask about:

• Setup charges

• Module-wise pricing

• Data migration

• Training

• Annual support

• Customisation cost

Check pricing structure here:

Step 8: Look for Scalability (Your University Will Grow)

Today you may have:

• 3,000 students

In 5 years you may have:

• 10,000 students

• Multiple campuses

• New programs

Your ERP should not break under growth.

Multi-campus institutions especially need strong central control.

Why Many Universities Choose MyLeading Campus®

MyLeading Campus® is designed for Indian autonomous and deemed universities with:

• Full academic + exam automation

• NAAC/NBA aligned reporting

• Mobile apps for students and faculty

• Finance + payroll integration

• Scalable infrastructure

Explore here:
👉 Complete University ERP

If you want to talk directly: Contact us 

FAQs (Real Answers) 1. How do I know if my university really needs ERP?

If you depend heavily on Excel, paper files, or disconnected systems, you already need ERP.

2. How long does implementation take?

Most universities take 3–6 months for core modules. Full rollout can take longer depending on size.

3. Can ERP help with NAAC preparation?

Yes. The biggest benefit is structured data availability year-round instead of last-minute compilation.

4. Is ERP useful for autonomous colleges?

Autonomous institutions benefit the most because exams, curriculum, and evaluation are more complex.

5. Will faculty resist using ERP?

Initially yes, if it’s complicated. But if the system is simple, adoption becomes natural.

6. Can ERP integrate with payment gateways?

Yes. Online fee payment is now a standard requirement.

7. What about student mobile apps?

In 2026, mobile access is expected. Students want attendance, fees, notices, results — instantly.

8. Is cloud ERP safe?

Yes, if proper encryption, backups, and access control are in place.

9. What is the biggest mistake universities make?

Choosing ERP based on demo looks, not based on daily usability and support.

10. What should we do before finalising ERP?

Involve all departments, run a pilot, ask for references, and score vendors objectively.

Final Thought

Choosing a university ERP is not an IT decision.

It is an institutional decision.

The right ERP will reduce workload, improve compliance, support growth, and make university operations smoother for everyone.

If you want a practical demo or consultation:
👉 contact Us

Accreditation has quietly become one of the biggest operational pressures on Indian colleges and universities.

NAAC and NBA are no longer once-in-five-years exercises. They demand continuous data readiness, documentation discipline, and proof—not promises.

Many institutions still rely on:

• Excel sheets maintained by different departments

• Google Drive folders with unclear ownership

• Manual data compilation before peer team visits

This approach doesn’t scale. It doesn’t survive audits. And it definitely doesn’t reduce stress.

That’s where a NAAC- and NBA-aligned College ERP changes the game.

This blog explains:

• How NAAC & NBA actually evaluate institutions

• Where colleges lose marks due to poor data systems

• How ERP simplifies compliance without extra workload

• What features matter from an accreditation lens

If you’re responsible for IQAC, academics, or governance, this is written for you.

Why NAAC & NBA Compliance Is Getting Harder Every Year

According to NAAC data:

• Over 70% of institutions lose marks due to documentation gaps, not academic quality

• Peer teams increasingly verify system-generated data instead of printed reports

• Continuous quality monitoring is now expected—not last-minute preparation

NBA, especially for engineering and professional programs, focuses heavily on:

• Outcome-based education (OBE)

• CO-PO-PSO mapping

• Evidence-backed continuous assessment

Accreditation today is less about “what you do” and more about “how well you can prove it.”

That proof lives in your systems.

The Real Problem: NAAC & NBA Data Lives in Too Many Places

In most colleges:

• Academic data sits with departments

• Student data sits with admin

• Finance data sits separately

• Research data is tracked manually

• Alumni data is scattered or outdated

When accreditation time arrives, everything needs to be merged, verified, formatted, and approved.

This is where errors happen—and marks are lost.

A modern College ERP system acts as a single source of truth.

(If you want a foundational understanding of ERP in higher education, read: this blog

How a NAAC-Ready College ERP Changes Accreditation Preparation

A well-designed ERP does three critical things for accreditation:

1. Captures data at the source

2. Structures data as per NAAC & NBA frameworks

3. Generates evidence-backed reports instantly

This is not about automation alone.
It’s about credibility.

Mapping NAAC Criteria with College ERP Modules

Let’s break this down practically.

NAAC Criterion I – Curricular Aspects

NAAC expects:

• Curriculum design and revision records

• BOS & academic council approvals

• Feedback implementation proof

With ERP:

• Curriculum versions are stored year-wise

• Changes are logged automatically

• Feedback data is linked to curriculum updates

No more hunting for old syllabus PDFs during peer team visits.

NAAC Criterion II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation

This is where most institutions struggle.

ERP supports:

• Student profile tracking

• Attendance records

• Internal assessments

• Continuous evaluation

NBA’s OBE framework fits naturally here:

• CO-PO mapping

• Attainment calculations

• Outcome reports

All backed by actual system data, not manual calculations.

NAAC Criterion III – Research, Innovations, and Extensions

ERP helps track:

• Faculty publications

• Research projects

• Grants and funding

• Extension activities

Instead of emailing faculty every year, data gets updated once and reused everywhere.

NAAC Criterion IV – Infrastructure and Learning Resources

ERP maintains:

• Asset registers

• Lab usage logs

• IT infrastructure records

This helps institutions prove utilisation, not just availability.

NAAC Criterion V – Student Support and Progression

One of the most overlooked criteria.

ERP enables:

• Scholarship tracking

• Placement records

• Alumni database

• Progression to higher studies

Institutions with proper alumni and placement data score significantly higher here.

NAAC Criterion VI – Governance, Leadership, and Management

This is where ERP becomes a leadership tool.

ERP provides:

• Policy documentation

• Decision records

• Financial transparency

• Role-based access

Peer teams increasingly expect digitally traceable governance, not verbal explanations.

NAAC Criterion VII – Institutional Values and Best Practices

ERP helps document:

• Environmental initiatives

• Inclusivity measures

• Gender equity programs

• Community engagement

With timestamped data and reports.

NBA Accreditation: Where ERP Becomes Non-Negotiable

NBA is far more technical.

It requires:

• Outcome-based education tracking

• Program-wise attainment

• Continuous improvement cycles

Manual systems cannot handle this at scale.

ERP automates:

• CO-PO mapping

• Assessment linkage

• Attainment analytics

• Action taken reports

This is why most NBA-accredited institutions use ERP as a backbone, not a support tool.

Real Impact: What Colleges Gain Beyond Accreditation

Institutions using ERP for NAAC & NBA report:

• 40–60% reduction in accreditation prep time

• Fewer last-minute errors

• Better internal coordination

• Continuous readiness instead of panic mode

For a broader view of ERP advantages, refer to: this blog

Choosing the Right ERP for NAAC & NBA (What Actually Matters)

Not all ERP systems are accreditation-ready.

What to look for:

• Flexible report formats

• Role-based access for IQAC

• Long-term data storage

• Audit trails

• Custom fields for accreditation metrics

A comparison perspective is covered here: this blog

Why Institutions Prefer MyLeading Campus® for Accreditation Alignment

Institutions choose MyLeading Campus® because:

• NAAC & NBA reporting is built into workflows, not added later

• Data stays structured year after year

• Multi-campus and autonomous needs are supported

Learn more about the platform here: click here

Pricing details are transparent and institution-friendly: Click here

Accreditation should reflect your institution’s quality—not your documentation stress.

FAQs: NAAC & NBA Integration with College ERP (Human Answers) 1. Can ERP really replace manual NAAC documentation?

ERP doesn’t eliminate documentation—but it eliminates duplication and chaos.
Most required data already exists inside the system, properly formatted.

2. Is ERP useful even if NAAC accreditation is years away?

Yes. Institutions that adopt ERP early score better because data history matters more than last-year performance.

3. Does ERP help during peer team visits?

Absolutely. Instant reports, clean dashboards, and traceable data build confidence with evaluators.

4. Can ERP handle both NAAC and NBA together?

Yes. A good ERP maps academic and outcome data once and uses it across both frameworks.

5. Will faculty find ERP too complex?

If implemented properly, ERP actually reduces faculty workload by removing repetitive reporting tasks.

6. How secure is accreditation data inside ERP?

Role-based access ensures only authorised users can view or modify sensitive data.

7. Can existing data be migrated into ERP?

Yes. Past academic, student, and assessment data can be migrated systematically.

8. Does ERP help with AQAR submissions?

Yes. ERP simplifies annual data collection, making AQAR preparation far easier.

9. Is ERP suitable for autonomous colleges?

ERP is especially valuable for autonomous institutions due to frequent curriculum changes and evaluations.

10. Who should lead ERP-driven accreditation internally?

Ideally, IQAC should own the process, with academic and admin teams contributing through ERP workflows.

Final Thought

NAAC and NBA are not getting easier.
But they are getting clearer about what they expect.

Institutions that treat ERP as an accreditation partner, not just software, stay compliant, confident, and future-ready.

If you want to explore this further, talk to the team here:
👉 Contact us